Hog Watch Manitoba News
April 2002

Index:
Public Meeting - Russell April 24
Proposed Hog Barn at Elkhorn
Pork Production will increase - Saskatchewan Government
Manitoba Sow Herd Building - US slows down due to Restrictions
Public Registry - April 16, 2002
Animal and human E. coli distinguishable National Sea Grant College Program Monday,
April 29, 2002 WASHINGTON DC


Economic Bonus or Local Disaster?

A public forum sponsored by Rural Bootstrap
Featuring Dr. Bill Weida and Lisa Bechthold of the GRACE Factory Farm Project

Wednesday, April 24, 2002 7:30 pm at the Russell Community Hall

Dr Bill Weida, Professor of Economics at the Colorado College, currently serves as an economic consultant to the Grace Foundation Factory FarmProject where he works with communities that are battling large scaleagricultural projects. He acts as an expert witness in permit hearings
and provides analysis of economic impacts.
A question period will follow...

Debate rages over plan for large hog operation
Pressure mounts on NDP to take control
By Leah Janzen
Winnipeg Free Press
April 12, 2002

The proposed conversion of a community pasture to a large hog operation has residents of a southwestern Manitoba municipality wrangling over what should happen to the land.

More than 200 people crammed into the Elks hall in Elkhorn Wednesday night to debate the sale of five sections of land located opposite the 'Welcome to Manitoba' tourist booth at the Manitoba/Saskatchewan border

Gent Farms wants the land to establish a large hog operation in the area located in the RM of Wallace.

But some residents say they weren't given enough information on the proposal and did not have enough say in the negotiations.

"We'd like a referendum on the issue," said area farmer Brent Nolan. "There is no democracy in municipal politics."

The fight between those wanting to establish intensive livestock operations and those concerned about the environmental impact of the barns has resulted in raucous near-brawls at rural municipality council meetings in some parts of the province in recent years.

A variety of people at the centre of the disputes say it's time for the province to take the responsibility for approving livestock proposals out of the hands of rural governments.

Weldon Newton, president of the Keystone Agriculture Producers, said the province needs to find a way to make the process run more smoothly.

"We need to find a way to get past the personal abuse that takes place at local meetings," he said. "I still support the rural municipalities having a say in the decision, but the province has to take some responsibility too."

Stuart Briese, president of the Association of Manitoba Municipalities, said he supports a two-hearing process in which the rural municipality would be responsible for approving the land use for new livestock operations.

The province would be responsible for handling environmental and enforcement approvals.
To date, Briese said, many municipalities struggling to find a way to balance their economic needs with residents' concerns have rewritten municipal bylaws to shoehorn projects into their area -- or to keep them out.

As a result, Briese said, there is little consistency in the bylaws around the province and livestock operations are left to fulfill certain requirements in one area which aren't necessary in others.

In January, 2001 an independent livestock stewardship panel recommended the province should have veto power over the establishment of new livestock operations in the province.

go to top

Animal and human E. coli distinguishable

DNA Technology Identifying E. Coli Sources; Notes Separate Human, Animal Sources >From National Sea Grant College Program Monday, April 29, 2002 WASHINGTON DC -
DNA TECHNOLOGY IDENTIFYING E. COLI SOURCES; NOTES SEPARATE HUMAN, ANIMAL SOURCES

Bacterial contamination in water is a major environmental problem that is indicated by high levels of E. coli counts. In a recent study, Illinois-Indiana Sea Grant researchers Charles Tseng and W.T. Evert Ting traced the sources of fecal pollution in Lake Michigan in an effort to halt the dangers of future E. coli contamination. Tseng and Ting based their research on the hypothesis that E. coli strains from humans are distinguishable from those of animals. By narrowing down the methods used to form DNA profiles with the random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) and the automated ribotyping techniques, they were able to create DNA fingerprints for human and animal sources. They then established a computer-based E. coli DNA profile database, which allowed them to identify similarities among the host species. Using the database, a model can be formed to trace the source of E. coli. Ultimately, the new technology will be transferred to environmental agencies and organizations in order to improve water quality worldwide.

CONTACT: Charles Tseng, Professor of Biology, Purdue University, Illinois-Indiana Sea Grant Researcher, (O) 219-989-2403, (F) 219-989-2130, Email: tseng@calumet.purdue.edu W.T.Evert Ting, Professor of Biology, Purdue University, Illinois-Indiana Sea Grant Researcher, (O) 219-989-2490, (F) 219-989-2130, Email: ting@calumet.purdue.edu

For more information, contact: Ben Sherman National Media Relations Director National Sea Grant College Program 202-662-7095 sherman@nasw.org Web site: http://www.seagrantnews.org