Hog Watch Manitoba News
August 2002

Index:
Experts hunt for cause of manure spill      Winnipeg Free Press  12 August 2002
Justice of the peace delays sentencing in pollution case   
                    Kingston Whig-Standard      August 01, 2002

Factory Farms   -   CBC-TV     THE NATIONAL    Aug 05, 2002
Minnesota Files Suit to Declare Renville County Hog Producer
              a Public Nuisance
   August 3, 2002
Taking the Stink Away      August 6, 2002   The Leader-Post (Regina)
Manure tank bursts near MacGregor        By Allan Dawson        
                    Farmers Independant Weekly

Huge Manure Spill Contaminates Rural Wells      Aug 8 2002
Pig Poop, Belleville Storm Water        August 9, 2002
More questionable manure tanks likely out there    
                  CBC News Online      Aug 13 2002

Neighbours wary of proposed animal dump (NIMBY)    
                  CBC News Online Aug 13 2002   St. Malo, Man.

Fish Kill in the Bouctouche River       August 21
New Rules to Govern Factory farm - Ontario August 21, 2002
                 The Toronto Star/National Post

Trial Begins over Odor Control Issues at Hog Farm in Nebraska
                  August 22, 2002

"The System is working"      VIEW POINT Aug 22, 2002
             John Morris FIW -Editor (Farmers Independent Weekly)

Factory farming 'spreading disease around the world'
             The Guardian - August 21, 2002

World Meat Demand to Rise, Animal Disease Fears - FAO

             August 26, 2002      Reuters      David Brough

Medical association warns about pig farms

             From CBC New Brunswick ... Moncton, N.B. -
The Saskatchewan Association of Rural Municipalities says red tape is              holding this province back from a booming business.
           CBC News Online - Saskatchewan News Digest 02/08/28 REGINA
Canadians may become immune to certain antibiotics.
CBC News Online
Drug traces surfacing in Saskatchewan River
Curb farm antibiotics, Ottawa told.
Globe and Mail, August 29
The Curse of Factory Farms  - New York Times - August 30
High on the Hog   
The Globe and Mail  August 30



Experts hunt for cause of manure spill
Four million liters contaminated wells after tank peeled 'like a banana'
By Aldo Santin
Winnipeg Free Press
Friday 12 August 2002

OPPONENTS to the hog industry were given fresh ammunition this week with the news that Manitoba's Conservation department has been unable to determine the cause of the largest liquid-manure spill in recent memory.
More than four million litres of liquid hog manure burst from a steel storage tank near MacGregor which is about 100 kilometres west of Winnipeg. The manure seeped into the ground and contaminated two water wells on the property
"This was a catastrophic failure of a steel storage tank," said Norm Brandson, deputy minister of Conservation. "The tank split down the side. It peeled back like a banana."
Brandson said the spill occurred late in the evening of July 21 on a medium-sized corporate hog operation in the RM of North Norfolk, about four kilometres north of MacGregor
Brandson said the spill was reported by the farm manager within 90 minutes and a cleanup of the site was begun immediately.
Tests were conducted on wells on adjacent property within 48 hours and showed no signs of contamination, Brandson said. Subsequent testing has also revealed that contamination has not spread beyond the farm site.
In May 2000 in Walkerton, Ont., manure laced with E. coli bacteria seeped into the town's water supply following a rainstorm. The contaminated water killed seven people and sickened 2,300 others. An inquest into the deaths estimated the cost of the tragedy at $155 million.
An official with the RM of North Norfolk said the property is owned by HP farms of Winkler. The hog operation is also owned by a Winkler-based corporation, Bits-O-Pork. Both entities are owned by Henry Penner of Winkler, who also owns Little Morden Service, a farm-equipment dealership in the area. Penner refused to comment on the incident.
Marcel Hacault, president of the Manitoba Pork Council, said the incident may be used to feed opposition to the expanding hog industry, but added that both the owner, the on-site manager and Conservation officials followed all proper procedures.
"The bad news is that there was a spill - the good news is that the procedures worked and it got cleaned up," Hacault said.
Brandson said the department has ordered the owner to install observational wells for long-term monitoring of the site for further contamination. He said department staff are still trying to determine what caused the accident.
The tank was constructed in 1997, one year before the province required all above-ground, liquid-manure storage devices to be designed by a professional engineer and for their construction to be supervised by an engineer
Doug Small, a senior engineer with DGH Engineering, said he's not aware of any spill of such magnitude since the tougher regulations were adopted in 1998. Small said that since the MacGregor tank was built before the new regulations, it was likely that a professional engineer wasn't involved in its design or construction.
Brandson said the department isn't considering charges against the owner, adding there are no signs of negligence or poor operations on the farm.
"The tank wasn't obviously defective," Brandson said. "Right now it looks like an accident. There are no basis for a charge to be laid."
Brandson said above-ground storage devices are considered safer and with less accompanying odour than lagoons, which had been the traditional way of storing liquid manure.
Hacault said the tank likely was holding a 400-day supply of liquid manure that would have been spread in the fall. He said storage tanks are so large because provincial regulations prohibit the spreading of liquid manure during the winter.
"There's only a small window in the spring and fall for spreading liquid manure," Hacault said.
HP Farms has made an application for a second hog operation in the area, a 1,200-sow facility near Austin. The application is awaiting technical reviews.

aldo.santin@freepress.mb.ca
go to top

Justice of the peace delays sentencing in pollution case
By Arthur Milnes
Kingston Whig-Standard
Thursday, August 01, 2002

Local News - It won’t be until the fall before a justice of the peace pronounces sentence on a controversial Napanee-area pig farm and two of it’s owner- operators.
Hay Bay Genetics, manager Mark Davis and company president Ron Davis were found guilty earlier this year of three counts under federal fisheries regulations of releasing effluent into Hay Bay and one count of failing to stop the release when ordered.
The convictions came after an eight-day trial in the Ontario Court of Justice in 2000.
An investigation was launched after a private citizen complained about the pig operation during the summer of 1998.
Court heard that samples from an outflow at the farm, which could be seen entering Hay Bay, showed that the substance – suspected to come from the manure produced at the farm – were dangerous to rainbow trout.
The defence had argued there was no evidence the deposits entered the bay.
Yesterday, justice of the peace Lorraine Watson put over sentencing after hearing presentations from federal prosecutor Dave Crowe and Hay Bay Genetics lawyer Gabrielle Kramer.
Attempts to come to an agreement on a joint-sentencing submission for Watson failed, court heard yesterday.
“Pollution is a crime and should be considered and dealt with as a crime,” Crowe said yesterday.
He told Watson she should fine the men $5,000 each and levy the same against the company. In addition, he said they should be ordered to pay a total of $50,000 to $60,000, as allowed in government regulations, to the Cataraqui Regional Conservation Authority for the Wilton Creek area.
The maximum fine is $300,000 per count, per person, court heard.
He described Hay Bay Genetics as a major operation.
“The gross revenues from the business range from $3.5 million gross per year to $5 million gross per year,” he said.
Crowe said Hay Bay Genetics didn’t fix the problem until threatened with charges. The company insisted on fighting the charges with a trial.
Defence lawyer Kramer took issue with Crowe’s suggestion that Hay Bay Genetics is a major operation.
“The Hay Bay farm is not by any means a large factory farm,” she said, adding there are fewer than 3,000 pigs there.
Kramer said her clients have a multimillion-dollar loan, aren’t making a lot of money and are community supporters who believe in environmental protection and sustainable farming.
She said there is no chance of the company re-offending and said her clients have spent hundreds of thousands of dollars ensuring their operation meets and exceeds environmental standards.
go to top

CBC-TV     THE NATIONAL Aug 05,2002
Host: DIANA SWAIN

Factory Farms

DIANA SWAIN: A growing number of people across Canada are familiar with living next to factory farms. And they are familiar with the smell. But it's the effect of that smell that's prompting serious concern. So much so that the three prairie provinces are working together to study how it affects human health and quality of life. More now from David Common.

DAVID COMMON (Reporter): His closest neighbours are more than a kilometer away. Still Wayne McArthur has a big problem with them.

WAYNE MCARTHUR (Pig Farm Neighbour): It's sickening. It's really sickening. It gets in your clothes, your skin, your hair, like it stays with you.

COMMON: It is the smell from this barn. Inside, a scene like this. Dozens of factory farms are intensive livestock operations, as they're called, exist across the Prairies, each one with thousands of pigs producing hydrogen sulphide, ammonia and nitrogen in their manure. In the past few years, odor complaints have become more frequent. That's prompted Alberta, Manitoba and Saskatchewan to launch a task force to study what effect that stench has on people.

TERRY HANLEY (Saskatchewan Environment): That nuisance factor. You can have potentially health effects down the line because if you're exposed to something that you consider a smell that you're uncomfortable with and are exposed to it, over a period of time, it can cause you stress.

COMMON: One recent study from the University of North Carolina found people who lived near hog barns are twice as likely to have headaches, sore throats and nausea, four times as likely to have diarrhea and five times as likely to stay indoors with the windows closed. But that study only looked at air quality issues, not at water. Since manure from the pigs is kept in giant sewage lagoons or spread over farmers fields as a fertilizer, there are concerns it could get into the water supply.

MCARTHUR: The run off comes right in to our land here. So like we're concerned about that. I mean they just started. It's only going to get worse.

COMMON: The pork industry, which is worth billions to provincial economies welcomes the study.

MARCEL HACAULT (Manitoba Pork Council): The government, I guess with this task force, is trying to find some answers similar to us. If there's a problem, we want to be able to deal with it.

COMMON: The prairie task force will begin the bulk of its work later this year. But with governments trying to attract more factory farms, this may come down to a battle between the economy and the environment.

David Common, CBC News, Regina.
go to top

Minnesota Files Suit to declare Renville County Hog Producer a Public Nuisance
August 3, 2002
Knight-Ridder Tribune
Dennis Lien, Saint Paul Pioneer Press, Minn.


The state of Minnesota contends that a large Renville County hog producer has, according to this story, violated an agreement to solve repeated air-quality problems at its feedlots.
The story says that Attorney General Mike Hatch and the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency filed a civil suit late Thursday against ValAdCo, asking a Renville County judge to declare the company a public nuisance and to make it stop violating emission standards for hydrogen sulfide, an odorous chemical that can cause health problems at certain thresholds.
Following hundreds of documented violations, ValAdCo last year installed an impermeable cover and an ozone treatment system at one of its manure lagoon sites, theoretically resolving the emissions problems.
The MPCA continued to monitor air, however, and has found 81 violations so far this year. Twenty-nine of the violations were for a standard that state law says should not be exceeded more than twice a year, and 52 were for a lower standard that should not be exceeded more than twice every five days.
go to top

Taking the Stink Away
August 6, 2002
The Leader-Post (Regina)
Jill Strelieff


SASKATOON -- New technology that takes the smell from pig manure could, according to this story, mean neighbours worried about the odour and pollution will no longer make a stink over hog farming in the province.
Dr. Gurunathan Lakshman, a Saskatoon researcher who invented the system, which uses chemical reactions to remove the smell, was quoted as saying, "Most pig operations are not even permitted on the land because of the
pollution and the smell but if you remove both of those two things, there's no argument against hog operations."
Raw manure is pumped into a storage tank, which feeds into the treatment system. The pig poop is then transferred into the first reaction tank where it is doused with a blend of non-toxic chemicals, creating a reaction that lasts for about eight minutes.
The liquid is then moved into the second reaction tank where it is again doused with a chemical blend, causing a four-minute reaction. It's then transferred into another tank where the waste is separated into an odour-free solid, which rapidly dries into a powder suitable for fertilizer, and a clear, decontaminated water. It can be recycled for use around the farm, such as barn washing or irrigation.
go to top

Manure tank bursts near MacGregor
By Allan Dawson
Farmers Independant Weekly


A million gallons of hog manure spilled from a steel storage tank at a hog barn north of MacGregor July 21 owned by Bits- O-Pork, an official from Manitoba Conservation confirmed at press time Tuesday. Cliff Lee said at least two nearby wells have been polluted. “As far as the contaminated water itself there isn’t much that can be done,” he said. “I think all we can do is monitor it.” The incident occurred at 9 p.m. and was reported by the barn manager to environment officials at 10:45 p.m. An environmental officer is working with the owner of the hog barn.
The first priority has been cleaning up, Lee said. “There is an environmental concern,” he said.“They cleaned up as much as they could, but there is a concern with groundwater contamination, especially of the well in the immediate vicinity.” The hog barn was built before regulations required manure storage facilities to be approved by a licensed engineer. The hog barn owner plans to construct another manure holding tank, but it will have to meet current standards, Lee said. “We’re close to the scene and we know what happened and what has to be done,” he said.
The spill confirmed the worst fears of those opposing intensive hog barn operations. According to a farmer near Austin, Bits-O-Pork wants to construct a new 1,200- sow barn near him.The farmer,who asked not to be named, is opposing it. Meanwhile, the Manitoba government has ordered all rural municipalities to revamp their development plans, determining where certain types of farming will be permitted and prohibited. Municipalities without plans will have to develop them.
Through new legislation, the current provincial guidelines for intensive livestock operations such as setbacks,with some room for local flexibility,will be made mandatory.A municipal council’s ruling with respect to locating a livestock operation will be final with no appeal. However, it’s far from clear whether municipalities that intend to severely restrict livestock operations or ban them outright,will be allowed to do so.
Last week on CBC Radio’s Questionnaire call-in show,Opposition leader Stewart Murray said while he sees hog production as important to Manitoba’s economy, he supports giving local governments the final say on whether they will be allowed and where.
go to top

Huge Manure Spill Contaminates Rural Wells
Aug 8 2002


MacGregor, Man. - Conservation officials are investigating after nearly four million litres of liquid pig manure leaked from a steel storage tank at a hog barn near MacGregor on July 21.

Cliff Lee, acting regional director for the Red River Region with Manitoba Conservation, says it is a serious accident. "We estimate approximately slightly less than a million gallons of manure was spilled onto the ground," he says.
"It's the first time a steel storage tank failed, and that amount of manure acutally spilled. We have testing done and it has impacted on the wells that are owned by the farm where the pig operation is."
Two wells at the farm were contaminated. Residents of a nearby farm have been told to have their well-water tested.
Lee says the soil contaminated by the spill has been scraped up and disposed of.
He says the tank involved in the spill was installed before legislation required operators to have a permit, but the new installation will have to qualify for a permit under current laws.

Copyright © 2002 CBC All Rights Reserved
go to top

More questionable manure tanks likely out there
CBC News Online - Manitoba News Digest 02/08/13
WebPosted Aug 13 2002 05:39 PM MDT
Winnipeg

Manitoba could be in for another catastrophic manure spill. That's what one businessman in the manure management industry is saying after four million litres of hog manure burst from an above-ground storage tank last month. Two wells were contaminated on the farm near MacGregor, west of Portage la Prairie.

Tom Struthers is president of Managro, a company that assembles steel storage tanks for hog barns. Since 1998, the government has required permits for such tanks. But Struthers says the tank that burst was installed before that, and there are many others just like it.

"There was a lot of tanks built prior to the regulations, and I would have to think that some of those tanks have not been built to specifications. And you know, the fact that this tank is burst likely means that there's a possibility there's others that may potentially be there waiting to happen."

Struthers looked at the tank after it was bulldozed into a pile of rubble after the spill. He says the tank was put together with recycled materials, and it was built before government permits were required.

The provincial conservation department says tanks built after 1998 undergo a rigorous permit process. But spokesman Dennis Brown admits those built before then are only checked "as time permits."

Brown also says the MacGregor hog facility, called "Bits o' Pork", has been ordered to "remediate and replace" the tank that burst. It seems the tank was severely corroded.
go to top

Neighbours wary of proposed animal dump (NIMBY)
CBC News Online Aug 13 2002
St. Malo, Man.

People who live in one corner of southeast Manitoba are wondering whether their area will become a dumping ground for thousands of dead animals. Government officials are thinking about designating a half dozen sites around rural Manitoba that could be used to bury animal carcasses in an emergency.

"It's important to have these sites because if we were faced with a major disposal situation with a mass number of livestock carcasses, we¹re going to have to do something with them," says Dr. Wayne Clayton, a federal veterinarian in charge of the site selection process.

"So it¹s better for us to be prepared ahead of time to know what we could do with them if our other methods of disposal, for example rendering, are overwhelmed. We're better to make the decisions when we can do it in a calm, orderly fashion."

Clayton points out that in the event of an outbreak of a disease such as foot-and-mouth, it's not just the diseased animals that have to be disposed of, but also thousands of healthy ones which can't be sold because the markets have shut down.

One possible site is a quarter-section of Crown land in the rural municipality of De Salaberry, just outside the community of Arnaud. Robert Kathler is a farmer who lives two kilometres from the proposed site.

He's worried about the potential for diseases being imported to the region, possible flooding at the site, and – most of all – how officials will define an "emergency."

"We probably need something like that for these emergency-type situations like happened in Europe, but I'm also afraid they're going to be used a little more on a daily basis for handling the overload that the rendering plants can't handle," Kathler says.
go to top

Fish Kill in the Bouctouche River
Association for the Preservation of the Bouctouche Watershed

The Association for the Preservation of the Bouctouche Watershed witnessed first hand yesterday (Tuesday 20 August 2002) dozens of several varieties of dead fish in the Bouctouche River about 2 Km from the church in Sainte-Marie-de-Kent, NB. Most of the dead fish were over nine inches long and one was a 22 inch Salmon.

Over the past three years, concerns have been raised by area citizens about the spraying of hog feces and urine from the largest hog operation east of Manitoba. One of the biggest concerns is the history of hog feces and urine runoff on watersheds. Statements by the Department of Environment and Local Government have done little to assure citizens of the benign nature of hog feces and urine spraying. Moreover, the delay in releasing water monitoring performed by the Department as far back as June 2001 has added to citizens concerns.

Department officials have stated that water monitoring related to Metz Farms II Ltd. has cost over $200,000 since 1999. The $70,000 Expert Committee Report commissioned by Premier Bernard Lord to address citizens concerns has been shelved from public scrutiny. And most recently, $1.5 million has been thrown into Metz Farms II Ltd. operation "to help" address serious issues related to the environment. Despite these large sums of money being spent, citizens feel the lack of concrete data and sloppy process leaves them wondering whom the Department is really protecting. Now there is a fish kill in the river.

Finding dead fish in a river in which area children swim is a concern for the Association. The cause of death of the fish has not yet been determined. The Association will continue to monitor the situation closely.

Contacts: Jerry Cook 506-955-3686

Association for the Preservation of the Bouctouche Watershed
L'association pour la préservation du basin versant de Bouctouche

Web: http://www.mondata.com/action
E-mail: pigs.poop.politics@mondata.com
go to top

Doctors want moratorium on new hog farms
Last Updated Wed Aug 21 18:57:52 2002
SAINT JOHN, N.B.-- The increase in industrial hog farming in Canada has led to a call for more investigation into the industry.

On Wednesday, at the national meeting of the Canadian Medical Association in Saint John, N.B., doctors voted overwhelmingly in favour of finding out more about what they feel could be a potential health risk.

Doctors feel they don't know enough about the real health risks involved in industrial hog farming. They want the CMA to recognize that and to support them in their concern.

Dr. Les Allaby, a New Brunswick physician, says he's concerned because doctors don't know enough about what damage is done.

"They want to look at the transmissibility of infection into the community from overburdened production, water quality and other environmental issues," he said.

More significantly, the doctors want a moratorium on hog farms until studies relieve their concerns.

Written by CBC News Online staff
Copyright © 2002 Canadian Broadcasting Corporation - All Rights Reserved
go to top

New Rules to Govern Factory farms;
Province Set to Replace Local Bylaws
August 21, 2002
The Toronto Star/National Post

Ontario Agriculture Minister Helen Johns was cited as saying that municipalities in Ontario will no longer have the right to regulate factory farms when the government's Nutrient Management Act goes into effect next spring, stating, "When all of our regulations come into effect ... (they) will replace all the municipal bylaws."

The stories say that proposals under the Nutrient Management Act would require most of the province's farmers to submit detailed information about the number of livestock and the types and amount of nutrients they use on their farms. The new rules were prompted by recommendations from Justice Dennis O'Connor that stemmed from his inquiry into the Walkerton tragedy, Johns said. Seven people died in May, 2000 after cow manure washed into the water supply during a torrential downpour, contaminating the water with a deadly bacteria.

Environment Minister Chris Stockwell was quoted as saying, "We are expecting the decision that we take will allow us not to have a repeat of Walkerton." Under the proposals, farms will be divided into categories based on nutrient units - the amount of nitrogen or phosphorus produced in the manure of their farm animals. Johns was further quoted as saying, "We are also going to (be)consulting on the standards for nutrient applications to the land.

We are going to be talking about setback distances for applying nutrients around waterways, the restrictions for spreading nutrients on snow-covered land, record keeping and data filing." The agriculture ministry will approve the plans and the environment ministry will enforce the regulations.

Ms. Johns said farmers and municipalities are being consulted to ensure the regulations "protect our water and the environment as well as maintain the competitiveness of agri-food industry," but she emphasized all parts of Ontario must be abide by the same rules. "The regulations ... have a standardized effect across the province, so what happens is the bylaws that are in place in local municipalities will be replaced by a standardized set of provincial regulations," she said.

Mr. Stockwell also announced the Conservatives' Safe Drinking Water Act will be introduced in the Ontario Legislature in the upcoming session of Parliament, which begins on Sept. 23.
go to top

Trial Begins over Odor Control Issues
                 at Hog Farm in Nebraska

August 22, 2002
Meating Place        Dan Murphy        http://www.meatingplace.com
Partnerships that operate two confinement pork production units in Boone County (Nebraska) and two in nearby Nance County are being sued in Boone County District Court by area residents who claim that the odor from the hog farms if offensive, according to a report from the Associated Press. Earl Stephens, 70, his wife, seven other couples and two men from St. Edward, Neb., filed the lawsuit against M&P Land Co., Beaver Valley Pork, Wolbach Foods Partnership, Northern Plains Partnership and PST Northern Nance Partnership, according to AP.

The lawsuit seeks unspecified damages and asks that the defendants be prohibited from continuing operations at the pork production facilities. David Domina, an attorney representing the partnerships, said the hog units are in a sparsely populated area and are in operational compliance with state permit requirements. The trial is expected to take about a week. In a related story researchers now say ultrasound may help remove some of the odor from hog manure.

David Soll, a biological sciences professor at the University of Iowa, has applied for a patent on ultrasound technology that cuts in half the buildup of hydrogen sulfide, a major odor-producing ingredient in hog manure (the "rotten egg" smell). Scientists and industry officials say the technology could be an inexpensive, way to minimize a major complaint against CAFOs and may be also effective in treating waste from dairy, beef cattle and poultry operations. "When [manure] has been treated, it definitely has a 'softer fragrance' to it," Bruce Rastetter, president of Heartland Pork Enterprises, the nation's No. 9 pork producer, told AP. In tests on small amounts of frozen manure, Soll found that ultrasound increased the solubility of the manure, slowed production of ammonia and speeded up oxidation.

A large-scale test is under way at a 1,300-head confinement barn south of Alden, Iowa, where manure in a storage pit has been piped through a "sonification chamber" before being pumped to a nearby lagoon. Acoustic waves generated by titanium tubes vibrating 20,000 times a second penetrate the manure, breaking chemical bonds and triggering reactions that alter the normal decomposition process. This spring, researchers will test ultrasound on larger confinement lots and lagoons. A panel of professional smell testers will judge the effectiveness of the technology, comparing the aroma of the treated manure with that of untreated confinement pens and lagoons, Soll said.

Opponents of large-scale hog farming are skeptical. Hugh Espey, rural project director for Iowa Citizens for Community Improvement in Des Moines, said making large operations smell better doesn't solve other problems, such as water pollution and the threat posed to smaller, family hog producers. "Our bottom line is Iowa has too many factory hog farms in the first place," Espey said. "We should be looking at ways to improve sustainable farming by smaller, independent producers."
go to top


"The System is working"
VIEW POINT Aug 22, 2002
John Morris FIW -Editor (Farmers Independent Weekly)

This is one of those stories that people clip and send to U.S. humor columnist Dave Barry, or the Jay Leno show for one of his schticks on silly headlines. A steel tank lets go, spilling four million litres of hog manure all over the landscape and con­taminating wells near MacGregor. The response from government and industry officials is that "the system worked" and that the owner should be praised for reporting the incident.
With all due respect and sympathy to the barn owner, who appears to be blameless in this mess, the latter comment is a real prize. Had he not reported the problem, one suspects he wouldn't have been able to cover up a million gallons of loose pig poop for too long.
That said, it took a couple of weeks for the news to leak out of the neighborhood to be picked up by this newspaper, and it is quite clear that Manitoba Conservation would just as soon that we had not heard about.
And what is Manitoba Conservation going to do to prevent such incidents in future? Nothing.
It says that if the tank was built after 1998, when a permit system was introduced, then Manitoba Conservation inspects it yearly. But if it was built before 1998, then the department can't and won't inspect it.
In other words,Manitoba Conservation diligently inspects the tanks that are not likely to leak. It doesn't bother checking the ones that are likely to leak, and it doesn't really know where they all are anyway because you didn't have to get a permit to put one up. Nor did it both­er checking to determine why the tank ruptured.
But don't worry.The system is working.
The Conservation department's view seems to be that this was an "accident" That's a word which is subject to interpretation - as is often argued, if you smash up your car after driving too fast on an icy road, that's not an accident but the consequence of deliberate behav­ior. Similarly, according to an official of Engineered Storage Products Company (ESPQ, the firm that makes manure storage tanks, this was a case of what it calls "gross negligence" through improper assembly. In response, Doug Brown of Manitoba Conservation will only say that he is not an engineer and therefore will not comment.
But engineers are available for him to hire and check on the department's behalf. So are government lawyers. Despite the 1998 permit regulations, they could surely find something in the statutes that would allow Manitoba Conservation or some other depart­ment to require identification and inspection of potentially haz­ardous facilities. If not, the law is an ass.
Not that the heavy hand of the law is necessary here. Surely the owners of these pre-1998, uninspected facilities would be more than willing to have someone come by and check them. ESPC, which is anxious to protect the reputation of this type of storage, would probably be willing to help.
What makes this all the more silly is that there is no need for controversy. Even Hog Watch, which opposes large corporate barns-, agrees that above-ground storage is the most desirable - if property constructed.
In defense of the critics, the hog industry points to the stringent regulations governing its operations. But it's frequently alleged that the regulations may be there, but the enforcement isn't.The Livestock Stewardship Panel was sufficiently concerned about that to raise this in its report. Manitoba Conservation has never given much confidence that the enforcement is in place, and the almost laughable response to this incident gives little indication that the department is interested in creating the perception or reality of enforcement that is required to give public confidence in the hog industry.
Indeed, the industry has the most to lose. Manitoba Pork has been running a successful and well-reasoned campaign portraying the hog industry as a good corporate citizen operating under stringent regula­tions. By its inaction, Manitoba Conservation is making those claims took hollow, and undermining public confidence in the industry. If it doesn't get excited about four million litres of manure blowing loose,can anyone really be expected to believe staff are monitoring application rates in accordance with nutrient analysis?
Manitoba Pork should be the strongest voice calling for the strict and visible enforcement of the rules.
And by the way, why does it say this in the Livestock Stewardship Initiative section of the Manitoba Agriculture website?
"On March 23, 2000, the government announced several other immediate actions to monitor and address the environmental impact of the livestock industry development."
"All constructed manure storage facilities will be inspected to ensure protection of surface and groundwater. Previously, only storages constructed after 1994 were inspected."
go to top


Factory farming 'spreading disease around the world'
The Guardian - August 21, 2002
By Felicity Lawrence, consumer affairs correspondent
The worldwide spread of factory farming is increasing poverty and threatening health, according to a report yesterday by Compassion in World Farming. The report collated for the first time data on livestock production in developing countries and economic analysis from World Bank and UN reports. The animal welfare organisation also examined figures on disease transmitted through food production around the world.
It concluded that the "livestock revolution" was putting small farmers out of business, thereby compromising developing countries' ability to feed themselves, and leading to a global increase in antibiotic-resistant infections. "In developed northern countries we are moving away from this sort of intensive farming - as we realise the extent of the environmental problems, and the cost to human health - but we are exporting these problems to developing countries instead," wrote Leah Garces, author of the report, Detrimental Impacts of Industrial Animal Agriculture. Global demand for meat is expected to double over 20 years, with developing countries becoming the main producers for the rest of the world. But as developing countries industrialise their livestock, their ability to feed themselves declines as small rural farmers are forced out of business, the report argued.
A case study showed how, until the 1970s, Brazil's livestock had been reared on small farms where animals and crops were interdependent and self-sustaining, with animals providing cash for food in years of poor harvest. By 1991, the industry was "vertically integrated", a few companies controlling meat processing, production of grain for feed, and farming itself. Thousands of small farmers could no longer compete. This pattern was repeated across Asia, Africa and Central America, and was driving urban migration and environmental degradation. Industrial animal farming also had implications for human health and food safety. Animals were often kept in overcrowded, poorly ventilated, dirty conditions - the ideal climate for disease.
Although the EU had banned use of animal parts in animal feed because of BSE, in many countries industrial livestock was still fed animal material, and meat from them was imported into the EU. Use of antibiotics to promote growth and prevent disease was routine. Nevertheless, food-borne illness, almost exclusively associated with animal products, was rising dramatically. Estimates by the UK public health laboratory service suggested 30% of raw chicken was contaminated with salmonella, and 75% was contaminated with campylobacter.
In the Netherlands, supplying much of the UK market, 85% of pigs sampled were found to be infected with campylobacter. Mirroring the rise in food-borne illness, was an increase in antibiotic-resistant infections. Their impact in developing countries could be devastating, the report said. Tests by Compassion in World Farming on factory chickens sold near Cape Town, South Africa, found they were contaminated by bacteria that caused severe diarrhoea, skin ulceration, and even typhoid. The bacteria were 100% resistant to common antibiotics.
go to top

World Meat Demand to Rise, Animal Disease Fears - FAO
August 26, 2002      Reuters      David Brough

ROME - The Rome-based Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO) was cited as saying Monday that global meat consumption is forecast to grow by two percent annually until the end of 2015 as the population and incomes rise and more people move to cities, but the increased trade and transport links raised risks of the spread of animal diseases across borders. FAO was cited as saying that since the early 1980s, global meat output, consumption and trade have expanded considerably, particularly poultry and pig meat, driven by population growth, rising incomes, urbanisation, changing diets and opening up of markets, adding, "These trends are set to continue with global meat consumption estimated to increase annually by two percent through 2015." Most of this increase will occur in the developing world, where consumption is expected to grow by 2.7 percent per year, compared to 0.6 percent per year in rich countries, FAO said. "It is expected that global production of meat will increase at a similar rate to demand and that with progressive reductions in trade barriers so

will trade in meat and meat products," the United Nations agency said. "However, increased volume of trade and improvements in transportation, infrastructure and technology hold potential risks of spreading of animal diseases rapidly worldwide." FAO said recent animal disease outbreaks in major meat exporting countries, such as mad cow disease, or bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE), had accelerated a shift in consumption away from red meat to poultry.
go to top


Medical association warns about pig farms
From CBC New Brunswick ... Moncton, N.B. -

The Canadian Medical Association is speaking out against large pig farms. It says they could be a threat to human health, just what some New Brunswickers have feared for some time.

Three years ago, a large hog farm housing 10,000 pigs opened 5 km down the road from Jerry Cook's home. He likes rural living and the clean environment that goes with it but not the pig farm.

"There were two parts of it that always upset me: the contamination of ground and surface water and the other is the emissions from the building."

Cook and dozens of others became well known protesters, lobbying government to get rid of the pig farm. Some worried about its effect on the environment. Others about its effect on people. Now, the group has received some indirect support from the Canadian Medical Association.

The CMA has passed three motions:
--- that industrial hog farms may be a threat to human health
--- that provinces temporarily halt expansion of industrial hog farming
--- that more research be done

Dr. Les Allaby, head of the New Brunswick Medical Association, supports the motion.

"There's been a big expansion in industrial hog farming in Ontario and Quebec apparently. It's encroaching on neighbouring communities and it's causing concern."

Allaby says currently there may not be a problem in New Brunswick, but industrial hog farms should be investigated.

But provincial Agriculture Minister Rodney Weston says he won't call for a moratorium. Weston says one large pig farm in New Brunswick has been studied and there isn't a problem.

To Jerry Cook, that's hogwash.

"I wondered if he was cleaning sand out of his ears because the policy of the province is just to bury its head and pretend this whole thing isn't happening."

Cook says the CMA's comments are another weapon in his group's arsenal and may help to close the nearby hog farm.

go to top

The Saskatchewan Association of Rural Municipalities says red tape is holding this province back from a booming business.
CBC News Online - Saskatchewan News Digest 02/08/28
REGINA

The group wants to make it easier for large hog and cattle operations to get the go-ahead to build in Saskatchewan.

The association's president, Neal Hardy, says right now it can take up to three years for a developer to set up shop, because most municipalities don't have any zoning for intensive livestock operations.

The association would like to see communities decide ahead of time whether they want cattle and hog barns, and then put the appropriate zoning in place.

"We want to get rid of the red tape as much as we can," explains Hardy. "But [deal with] environmental concerns, water pollution and all the rest. Look after that because that's very important." "At the same time, don't make a developer spend hundreds of thousands of dollars going through a bunch of red tape that doesn't do anything for anybody when they could be spending it into the developing themselves," he urges.

Hardy believes a plan like this would boost the economy and create jobs and he says the Saskatchewan Association of Rural Municipalities has been holding meetings with government officials and others on the issue. The group plans to have a set of proposed bylaws developed for its mid-term convention in November.

The idea is not without its opponents, however. Isabel Muzichuk farms near a large hog operation and runs a group called "The Concerned Citizens for a Safe and Healthy Environment." She's frustrated that the public isn't being consulted on this issue. "It really concerns me that meetings are going on behind doors with governments and municipalities without even consulting with farm families in this province," exclaims Muzichuk.

"They'd better remember that the taxpayers are still out here, and we do not want this kind of pollution going on in our backyard."
go to top

 

An expert panel in drug immunity and agriculture told Health Canada that it should tighten up certain rules or Canadians may become immune to certain antibiotics.
CBC News Online - Saskatchewan News Digest 02/08/30 SASKATOON

Penicillin and other drugs for animals can be purchased at many farm supply stores and gas stations. The panel reccommends making all animal drugs prescription-only.

Curt Hagele is with the Saskatchewan Veterinary Medicine Association. He says farmers risk losing all access to antibiotics if they're not used carefully.

"You know the average producer, to protect his industry, is responsibly using these drugs, but sometimes the information isn't there that a veterinarian might be able to provide them with to make sure that he's doing what's really the best thing to do with those drug" says Hagale.

Donald Low is a microbiologist at Toronto's Mount Sinai hospital. He is also a member of the panel that made the recommendations. He says it's too easy for farmers to buy injectable drugs to treat sick animals.

"Well we found it was difficult to know that because there's no way of tracking microbial use in Canada and that was one of the reccomendations, that we should be able to track use," says Low

Low's panel told Health Canada it would be safer to sell animal drugs by prescription only. They also want to study the antibiotics that are constantly being mixed into livestock feed.

Michel Lepage farms east of Saskatoon. He has 60 head of cattle, but he doesn't believe in fattening them with drugs. He says he gets a better price for his meat that way. He warns food will cost more if authorities make every producer follow more stringent rules.

"I think the consumer might have to think of that and the end result would be higher prices for the meat," says Lepage.

Health Canada says it is planning an education campaign for livestock producers. Department officials say they are still reviewing the rest of the panel's recommendations.
go to top

Drug traces surfacing in Saskatchewan river
Traces of anti-biotics have turned up in the South Saskatchewan River.

Water samples have shown small amounts of various pharmaceuticals in the river, everything from birth-control hormones to cholesterol-lowering drugs.

Mark Servos of the National Water Research Institute says it's nothing to worry about. "There's very little evidence to suggest that these chemicals make it through water treatment facilities", says Servos. "There's only few indications and very unique cases where drinking water seems to have been contaminated."

Servos says traces of pharmaceuticals are turning up in rivers across North America and Europe.

But the amounts are so small, they don't pose any immediate risks to the Environment.

go to top

Curb farm antibiotics, Ottawa told
Panel recommends restricting drugs used on livestock as fears of risk
to humans increase
By STEPHEN STRAUSS, Globe and Mail
Thursday, August 29, 2002 – Page A10

The use of antibiotics by Canadian farmers should be significantly reduced and placed under tighter controls, says a report prepared for Health Canada by an expert panel.

The recommendations come as fears rise that the heavy use of antibiotics in farming is placing humans at risk from infection by dangerous, drug-resistant superbugs.

The 19-member group, which included representatives of agricultural organizations, spent two years preparing its report, which has yet to be publicly released.

The panel's six major recommendations:

Antibiotics for agricultural use should be obtained only by prescription. Antibiotics can be bought from feed stores and co-ops, and are routinely added to feed.

The import of antibiotics should be regulated. Antibiotics are imported without the requirement of licences from countries such as China and Taiwan.

Antibiotics should be used only for the purposes for which they have been approved. Some antibiotics are administered to animals not to fight disease but to help fatten them. The widespread use of antibiotics for this purpose is estimated to increase an animal's weight by 1 per cent to 11 per cent.

The mechanism by which antibiotics promote growth is not known. However, there are strong suspicions that continued low dosages diminish the effects of endemic diseases, ramp up the immune system or kill digestion-inhibiting bacteria in the gut.

Growth-promoting antibiotics should be tested to determine which are effective.

"I think farmers will favour this because they don't want to be paying for things which are not truly effective," said panel-member Donald Low, chief microbiologist at Mount Sinai Hospital in Toronto and a world expert in antibiotic resistance. "If we have data saying they are wasting their time here, they won't want to use these drugs."

The use of antibiotics by farmers and ranchers should be monitored. No one knows the amounts, but estimates have pegged use in North America at 80 per cent to 87 per cent by weight of all antibiotics sold. However, this estimate could be misleading because when antibiotics are used for growth promotion, dosages tend to be very low.

The rise of antibiotic resistance in farm animals should be monitored. While there are no useful figures, a study published last year in the New England Journal of Medicine says that in the area of Washington, D.C., drug-resistant strains of salmonella related to food poisoning were found in about 17 per cent of chopped meats and 17 per cent of chickens.

"If you don't know what the problem is, it is hard to solve it," Dr. Low said.

A recent study in the United States suggests that animal-induced resistance to just one common antibiotic -- fluoroquinolone -- results in 400,000 excess days of diarrhea a year.

The Canadian approach of increased vigilance and regulation cuts a middle course through a range of possible responses by government.

In 1998, the European Union banned for use as animal-growth promoters antibiotics that are important in human medicine. Recent studies in Denmark, which initiated a similar ban in 1995, indicate the effectiveness of such a ban. Resistance by chickens to one common antibiotic fell to 6 per cent from 73 per cent, and by pigs to 28 per cent from 94 per cent.

The recommendations are not a "Draconian approach," Dr. Low said. But they likely will not constitute the last word in a rapidly evolving field. He said the collection of more animal data on farm-animal antibiotic resistance here and in the United States could move scientific sentiment toward a European-like ban.
go to top


The Curse of Factory Farms
New York Times
August 30, 2002

Factory farms have become the dominant method of raising meat in America. Agribusiness loves the apparent efficiency that comes with raising thousands of animals in a single large building where they are permanently confined in stalls or pens. Most of the human labor can be automated. It takes less land, because the animals live cheek by jowl their entire lives. And it allows the concentration of enormous stocks of animals in the hands of a few corporations whose goal is usually complete vertical integration — the control of production from birth through butchering and packaging.

These plants, called confined animal feeding operations, or CAFO's, now exist in 44 states. The question is how to minimize their harmful environmental effects and prevent them from putting a final squeeze on smaller farmers, especially those who raise animals in more traditional, grass-based ways.

Factory farms have taken root mainly where zoning laws were lax or nonexistent, or in states where citizens were prevented from filing suits against agricultural operations. The inevitable byproduct of huge concentrations of animals is huge concentrations of manure, which is stored in open lagoons and eventually sprayed on farmland, though there is usually far more manure than local fields can absorb. In such quantities, manure becomes a toxic substance. Spills are always a risk, as is groundwater contamination. The bigger danger is airborne contamination of water from ammonia, which rises from the lagoons and falls into low-lying rivers and estuaries.

A new report from the Sierra Club, titled "The Rapsheet on Animal Factories," draws a vivid portrait of the environmental violations caused by factory farms, many of which are owned by some of America's largest agricultural corporations, including ConAgra, Tyson Foods, Cargill and Smithfield Farms. What brought these factory farms to the Sierra Club's attention was a pattern of violations that resulted in criminal charges and fines, most often caused by toxic spills.

The federal government should at minimum serve as a neutral umpire in the fight between big and small farmers. In the case of factory farms it should try to control their threat to the environment through broader, more vigorous application of the Clean Water Act, typically invoked only in the most egregious cases. And it should never use taxpayer money to encourage a method of farming that works against the public's desire for open space, biodiversity and clean, non-malodorous air.

Unfortunately, the government has been putting its weight behind big business. The Environmental Protection Agency has issued basically toothless rules under which the states give permits to any factory farm that comes up with a plan for handling manure, mainly by building larger lagoons to hold it. The new farm bill that President Bush signed in May adds further insult by paying farmers up to $450,000 apiece to help them comply with regulations that don't mean much to begin with.

The regressive farm bill also continues the government's policy of throwing its weight behind the already hefty industrial farms and helping to drive smaller farmers out of business. In Iowa, for instance, the number of hog farms has dropped from 64,500 in 1980 to 10,500 in 2000, though the number of hogs, about 15 million, remains the same. The public's money, in this fight, is going in the opposite direction of the public interest.

The concentration typical of factory farms extends to the genetic level as well. The poultry and pork industries depend on just a handful of different types of turkeys, chickens and pigs, and the beef industry is headed in that direction too. There has been a precarious narrowing of the genetic resources that supply most of America's meat.

The danger is that of an inverted pyramid, an enormous number of animals all resting on the same narrow genetic base, exposing them to the risk of catastrophic disease and requiring an inappropriate use of antibiotics to ensure their health. Genetic diversity is no less important in domesticated animals, like hogs and chickens, than it is in wild animals. The best way to guarantee it is to guarantee a diversity of farmers.

go to top
go to home page

Last updated: September 8, 2002